Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Marks results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 366 hits . Analysis detected 4,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (6,000 of 6,575 authors). This Michael Marks is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Michael Marks
Author details
Total words: 8,748
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst