Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Negotiations results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 4,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,702 of 16,562 topics). This Budget Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Budget Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 2,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 17.8%17.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.2%19.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos