Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Dining results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,861 hits. Analysis detected 8,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,608 of 16,412 topics). This Budget Dining is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Budget Dining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 23.3%23.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.6%16.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos