Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruno Mars results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 481 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,095 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,130 of 16,194 topics). This Bruno Mars is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Bruno Mars
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,095
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos