BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Representativeness Heuristic, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 317 faulty-reasoning hits from 365 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32% and a BS Rank of 16% (17,855 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the article peer group.

"I Just Might" rises to a new peak of No. 2 on Billboard's Adult Contemporary chart, establishing a new all-time high. 
The track reaches the runner-up position in its twenty-sixth week on the roster  after half a year on the tally  which is known as one of the slower-moving radio rankings in America. 
Mars comes within one rung of earning another leader, but Alex Warren’s “Ordinary” refuses to vacate the top spot. 
The smash spends a thirty-seventh week at No. 1 on the Adult Contemporary chart, extending one of the longest reigns the ranking has ever seen. 
With another frame in charge, “Ordinary” stands alone as the sole third-longest-running No. 1 in the history of the Adult Contemporary chart. 
Warren’s hit breaks out of a tie with Maroon 5’s “Girls Like You,” which ruled for 36 weeks beginning in 2018. 
Now, that cut  which is largely known as a collaboration with Cardi B, though AC stations didn’t always play that version  slips to fourth place on the all-time list. 
Only two songs have spent more time atop the ranking. 
Miley Cyrus’s “Flowers” remains the longest-running leader, with 57 weeks at No. 
1. 
Teddy Swims’s “Lose Control” follows with a 49-frame stint in charge. 
As “I Just Might” celebrates 26 weeks on all three of *Billboard*’s pop radio charts, it remains inside the top 10 on each and every one of them. 
The track holds at No. 2 on the Adult Pop Airplay list after previously reaching No. 
1. 
On the Pop Airplay tally, “I Just Might” rises from No. 7 to No. 
6. 
The single also ruled that rundown earlier in its run. 
“I Just Might” appears on 12 *Billboard* charts this week, and it occupies the top 10 on almost every one of them. 
The single leads the highly-competitive Radio Songs register for a twenty-first week, standing out as one of the longest rulers ever. 
The cut also returns to No. 1 on both the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs and Hot R&B Songs charts, which are built using not only airplay data, but also sales and streams. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%Hugh McIntyre: 1.7%Forbes: 3.2%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 3.8%Hugh McIntyre: 4.0%Forbes: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.8%This article: 8.5%Hugh McIntyre: 3.4%Forbes: 3.0%Availability Heuristic8.5%This article: 9.3%Hugh McIntyre: 1.7%Forbes: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic9.3%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 3.7%Forbes: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Hugh McIntyre: 2.3%Forbes: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias5.8%This article: 16.4%Hugh McIntyre: 5.3%Forbes: 5.9%Framing Effect16.4%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.7%Forbes: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Hugh McIntyre: 2.5%Forbes: 3.8%Optimism Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Hugh McIntyre: 3.4%Forbes: 5.6%Negativity Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Hugh McIntyre: 6.2%Forbes: 2.9%Halo Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Hugh McIntyre: 2.4%Forbes: 1.6%Recency Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.7%Forbes: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 3.3%Forbes: 4.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 6.0%Forbes: 5.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.9%Forbes: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.4%Forbes: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.5%Hugh McIntyre: 6.9%Forbes: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.5%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 1.7%Forbes: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.6%Forbes: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 4.5%Forbes: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 19.2%Forbes: 4.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 2.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hugh McIntyre: 0.0%Forbes: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

365 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.