Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brunch Spots results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,387 hits. Analysis detected 6,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,684 of 16,562 topics). This Brunch Spots is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Brunch Spots
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,260
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.7% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.6%32.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.2%21.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos