Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brown University Shooting results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 4,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,070 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,650 of 16,562 topics). This Brown University Shooting is worse (more manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Brown University Shooting
Topic details
Total words: 3,070
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.0% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos