Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn Federal Court results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,728 of 16,562 topics). This Brooklyn Federal Court is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Brooklyn Federal Court
Topic details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos