Topic summary
⁠90%3 analyzed articles/videos1,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridges results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 1,164 hits. Analysis detected 6,939 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,650 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,427 of 16,562 topics). This Bridges is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Bridges
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,650
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos