Topic summary
⁠26%2 analyzed articles/videos699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bribery results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 3,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,872 of 16,562 topics). This Bribery is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Bribery
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,104
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos