Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breakups results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Recency Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 604 hits. Analysis detected 3,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,174 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,758 of 16,562 topics). This Breakups is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Breakups
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠60%Breakups (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,174
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 19.0%19.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos