Topic summary
25% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breakfast results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 4,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,095 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,608 of 16,118 topics). This Breakfast is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Breakfast
Topic details
Total words: 6,095
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst