Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Branding results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 6,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,256 of 16,562 topics). This Branding is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Branding
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠39%Branding (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos