Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos2,941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brand Strategy results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,546 hits. Analysis detected 25,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,464 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,344 of 16,562 topics). This Brand Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Brand Strategy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 21,464
Article count: 8
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate