Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Boyle Heights Fire results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 3,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Boyle Heights Fire is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Boyle Heights Fire
Topic details
Total words: 1,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 45.1%45.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 44.4%44.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 16.0%16.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 45.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 44.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Red Herring: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos