Topic summary
⁠84%4 analyzed articles/videos1,826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Box Office results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,157 hits. Analysis detected 11,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,874 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,339 of 15,447 topics). This Box Office is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Box Office
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,874
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.2%13.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.7%10.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos