Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bowlero Corporation results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,204 hits. Analysis detected 9,666 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,181 of 16,562 topics). This Bowlero Corporation is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Bowlero Corporation
Topic details
Total words: 6,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos