Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bowl Games results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 1,538 hits. Analysis detected 13,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,166 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,251 of 16,562 topics). This Bowl Games is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Bowl Games
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,166
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
4.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 12.5%12.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.5%21.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos