Topic summary
⁠16%4 analyzed articles/videos2,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Botnets results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,188 hits. Analysis detected 8,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,939 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,683 of 16,562 topics). This Botnets is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Botnets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,939
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751005.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos