Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boris Johnson Into Ukraines Kill Zone results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 2,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,986 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,193 of 16,562 topics). This Boris Johnson Into Ukraines Kill Zone is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Boris Johnson Into Ukraines Kill Zone
Topic details
Total words: 1,986
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 30.1%30.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.0%23.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos