Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Security Policies results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 1,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,489 of 16,562 topics). This Border Security Policies is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Border Security Policies
Topic details
Total words: 3,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos