Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol Raids results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 2,309 hits. Analysis detected 9,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,540 of 16,562 topics). This Border Patrol Raids is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Border Patrol Raids
Topic details
Total words: 8,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.4%26.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos