Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol Checkpoints results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 549 hits . Analysis detected 3,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,493 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,251 of 15,435 topics). This Border Patrol Checkpoints is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Border Patrol Checkpoints
Topic details
Total words: 1,493
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.9% percentile 10.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 26.3% 26.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 36.8% 36.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 16.7% 16.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 23.8% 23.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 26.3% 26.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.6% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst