Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Patrol Activity results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 2,468 hits. Analysis detected 16,386 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,095 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,591 of 16,562 topics). This Border Patrol Activity is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Border Patrol Activity
Topic details
Total words: 9,095
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 16.8%16.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.1%27.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.2%21.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos