Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Infrastructure results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 1,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,585 of 16,562 topics). This Border Infrastructure is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Border Infrastructure
Topic details
Total words: 2,166
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos