Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Book Promotion results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 602 hits . Analysis detected 3,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,062 of 16,562 topics). This Book Promotion is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Book Promotion
Topic details
Total words: 1,808
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.6% percentile 7.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 23.8% 23.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 33.3% 33.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Tu Quoque: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst