Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Book Adaptation results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 1,042 hits. Analysis detected 3,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,869 of 16,562 topics). This Book Adaptation is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Book Adaptation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠71%Book Adaptation (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,208
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.5%32.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos