Topic summary
61%1 analyzed article/video367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bon Secours Mother And Baby Home Tuam results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 1,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,101 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,903 of 16,562 topics). This Bon Secours Mother And Baby Home Tuam is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
Bon Secours Mother And Baby Home Tuam
Topic details
Total words: 1,101
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 24.8%24.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.7%10.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos