Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bombing results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 2,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,071 of 16,562 topics). This Bombing is better (less manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Bombing
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos