Topic summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boat Malfunction results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Recency Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 2,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,300 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,310 of 16,300 topics). This Boat Malfunction is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Boat Malfunction
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,300
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos