Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Blindness results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 3,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,954 of 16,562 topics). This Blindness is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Blindness
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 23.7%23.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos