Topic summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos5,743 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bkt results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 4,465 hits. Analysis detected 28,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,153 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (8,571 of 15,142 topics). This Bkt is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Bkt
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 20,153
Article count: 7
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.2%22.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate