Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video1,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bird Populations results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,717 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,059 of 16,562 topics). This Bird Populations is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Bird Populations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,717
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos