Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos852 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bipolar Disorder results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 282 hits. Analysis detected 2,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,713 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,876 of 16,562 topics). This Bipolar Disorder is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Bipolar Disorder
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,713
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.4%10.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos