Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bipartisan Cooperation results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Loss Aversion , and Slippery Slope , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 249 hits . Analysis detected 1,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,581 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Bipartisan Cooperation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Bipartisan Cooperation
Topic details
Total words: 1,581
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst