Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Binge Watching results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hindsight Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 1,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.6% and a BS Rank of 95% (949 of 16,562 topics). This Binge Watching is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Binge Watching
Topic details
Total words: 567
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.3% percentile 11.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles567 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 30.7% 30.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 30.7% 30.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 48.0% 48.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 20.5% 20.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 20.5% 20.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 48.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 30.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 20.5%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst