Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bilateral Military Cooperation results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (11,336 of 21,581 topics). This Bilateral Military Cooperation is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Bilateral Military Cooperation
Topic details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos