Topic summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video475 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bias Reduction results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 1,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,694 of 16,562 topics). This Bias Reduction is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Bias Reduction
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos