Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Beverage Industry results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 694 hits. Analysis detected 2,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,921 topics). This Beverage Industry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Beverage Industry
Topic details
Total words: 1,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 36.9%36.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos