Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video972 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Shapiro results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Straw Man, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 657 hits. Analysis detected 5,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,496 of 16,562 topics). This Ben Shapiro is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group.
Ben Shapiro
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.9% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 22.1%22.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 18.2%18.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.1%15.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.7%15.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos