Topic summary
⁠76%3 analyzed articles/videos2,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belgian Grand Prix results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 3,186 hits. Analysis detected 8,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,655 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,175 of 15,690 topics). This Belgian Grand Prix is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Belgian Grand Prix
Topic details
Total words: 8,655
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 36.8%36.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos