Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adrian Back results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 935 hits . Analysis detected 2,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,835 of 6,625 authors). This Adrian Back is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Adrian Back
Author details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 33.4% 33.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 33.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst