Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Beirut results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Beirut is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Beirut
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 268
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles268 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 53.0%53.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 53.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos