Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Behavioural Science results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 765 hits . Analysis detected 4,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,558 topics). This Behavioural Science is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Behavioural Science
Topic details
Total words: 5,900
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst