Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Behavioral Finance results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 5,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,827 of 16,562 topics). This Behavioral Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Behavioral Finance
Topic details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 27.7%27.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 23.2%23.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 18.8%18.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.7%16.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.8%13.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.0%28.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos