Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Jenkin results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 699 hits . Analysis detected 5,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (780 of 6,628 authors). This Ted Jenkin is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Ted Jenkin
Author details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 27.7% 27.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 23.2% 23.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 18.8% 18.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.7% 16.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.0% 28.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.6% 7.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 28.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 27.7%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Author 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 23.2%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 18.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst