Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Behavioral Economics results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 4,247 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,169 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,330 of 16,562 topics). This Behavioral Economics is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Behavioral Economics
Topic details
Total words: 8,169
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.4% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos