Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beef Industry results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Straw Man, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 965 hits. Analysis detected 5,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,928 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,046 of 16,562 topics). This Beef Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Beef Industry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,928
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 24.6%24.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.8%22.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos