Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bear Management results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 1,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,953 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,903 of 16,531 topics). This Bear Management is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Bear Management
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,953
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.2%5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos