Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bear Attack results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,393 of 16,562 topics). This Bear Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Bear Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos